<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 Disk Thrashing Quickie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bashelton.com/2009/05/windows-7-disk-thrashing-quickie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bashelton.com/2009/05/windows-7-disk-thrashing-quickie/</link>
	<description>Technology enthusiast gone rambling lunatic!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://bashelton.com/2009/05/windows-7-disk-thrashing-quickie/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bashelton.com/?p=621#comment-270</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d imagine it was work done in Redmond. Actually, what I find rather sad about the auto-defragmentation task is that it assumes &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; users are stupid and ignorant. While the vast majority of people have zero understanding of what goes on &quot;under the hood,&quot; I think it&#039;s pretty ridiculous that it takes power users, enthusiasts, developers, and other advanced users at least several hours of digging just to find out what&#039;s causing endless disk activity. Another thing that annoys me is that when I was doing a search, one of the links I followed was to a thread on MSDN where someone posted (and I&#039;m paraphrasing here as I don&#039;t have the link on hand right now) &quot;Well, it&#039;s not going to hurt your drive&#039;s life span so why are you worried? If you turn it off and on, that&#039;ll do more damage.&quot;

The issue isn&#039;t a matter of killing the hardware any sooner but rather &lt;b&gt;making it more usable during the hardware&#039;s lifetime&lt;/b&gt;. If a bunch of automatically started disk-accessing processes fire off at once, even if they purportedly run only when the system is idle, it&#039;s useless if the system becomes almost unresponsive. That&#039;s what happened in my case: It took nearly a minute and a half for the screen to go from black to fully rendered. It&#039;s like selling someone a car and telling them &quot;Hey, the vehicle does self-maintenance. Isn&#039;t that cool? Oh, by the way, if it&#039;s doing maintenance on itself, there&#039;s a possibility that you won&#039;t be able to start it if the vehicle is parked, and if you&#039;re driving, it may freeze up!&quot;

When I tried an earlier release of Ubuntu (7.something, IIRC), I recall that they had several indexing services enabled by default. Since I had installed it on my laptop, I was pretty upset by that particular service running &lt;i&gt;constantly&lt;/i&gt; from boot. Many mobile users complained about it and Canonical listened. The difference, of course, being that even if you didn&#039;t know what was starting the service under Linux, you could terminate the process and go about your business of finding it later. With Windows, there&#039;s too much black magic behind the scenes to know half of what&#039;s going on anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d imagine it was work done in Redmond. Actually, what I find rather sad about the auto-defragmentation task is that it assumes <i>all</i> users are stupid and ignorant. While the vast majority of people have zero understanding of what goes on &#8220;under the hood,&#8221; I think it&#8217;s pretty ridiculous that it takes power users, enthusiasts, developers, and other advanced users at least several hours of digging just to find out what&#8217;s causing endless disk activity. Another thing that annoys me is that when I was doing a search, one of the links I followed was to a thread on MSDN where someone posted (and I&#8217;m paraphrasing here as I don&#8217;t have the link on hand right now) &#8220;Well, it&#8217;s not going to hurt your drive&#8217;s life span so why are you worried? If you turn it off and on, that&#8217;ll do more damage.&#8221;</p>
<p>The issue isn&#8217;t a matter of killing the hardware any sooner but rather <b>making it more usable during the hardware&#8217;s lifetime</b>. If a bunch of automatically started disk-accessing processes fire off at once, even if they purportedly run only when the system is idle, it&#8217;s useless if the system becomes almost unresponsive. That&#8217;s what happened in my case: It took nearly a minute and a half for the screen to go from black to fully rendered. It&#8217;s like selling someone a car and telling them &#8220;Hey, the vehicle does self-maintenance. Isn&#8217;t that cool? Oh, by the way, if it&#8217;s doing maintenance on itself, there&#8217;s a possibility that you won&#8217;t be able to start it if the vehicle is parked, and if you&#8217;re driving, it may freeze up!&#8221;</p>
<p>When I tried an earlier release of Ubuntu (7.something, IIRC), I recall that they had several indexing services enabled by default. Since I had installed it on my laptop, I was pretty upset by that particular service running <i>constantly</i> from boot. Many mobile users complained about it and Canonical listened. The difference, of course, being that even if you didn&#8217;t know what was starting the service under Linux, you could terminate the process and go about your business of finding it later. With Windows, there&#8217;s too much black magic behind the scenes to know half of what&#8217;s going on anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Herren(Pedmont)</title>
		<link>http://bashelton.com/2009/05/windows-7-disk-thrashing-quickie/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Herren(Pedmont)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bashelton.com/?p=621#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Wow... I wonder what brilliant, outsourced Indian came up with the brialliant design and function of that process... MS never ceases to amaze me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; I wonder what brilliant, outsourced Indian came up with the brialliant design and function of that process&#8230; MS never ceases to amaze me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

